Quantcast
Channel: Atty. Manuel J. Laserna Jr.
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4572

The chair and commissioners of the Commission on Human Rights may be removed from office only for cause and with due process of law. -- "If there are charges against Bautista for misfeasance or malfeasance in office, charges may be filed against her with the Ombudsman. If he finds a prima facie case against her, the corresponding information or informations can be filed with the Sandiganbayan which may in turn order her suspension from office while the case or cases against her are pending before said court. This is due process in action. This is the way of a government of laws and not of men."

Previous: The chair and commissioners of the Commission on Human Rights do not serve "at the pleasure of the President." -- "Indeed, the Court finds it extremely difficult to conceptualize how an office conceived and created by the Constitution to be independent as the Commission on Human Rights-and vested with the delicate and vital functions of investigating violations of human rights, pinpointing responsibility and recommending sanctions as well as remedial measures therefor, can truly function with independence and effectiveness, when the tenure in office of its Chairman and Members is made dependent on the pleasure of the President. Executive Order No. 163-A, being antithetical to the constitutional mandate of independence for the Commission on Human Rights has to be declared unconstitutional."
$
0
0

MARY CONCEPCION BAUTISTA vs. SENATOR JOVITO R. SALONGA, COMMISSION ON APPOINTMENTS COMMITTEE ON JUSTICE, JUDICIAL AND BAR COUNCIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS AND HESIQUIO R. MALLILLIN, EN BANC, G.R. No. 86439 April 13, 1989.

“x x x.

PETITIONER BAUTISTA MAY OF COURSE BE REMOVED BUT ONLY FOR CAUSE

To hold, as the Court holds, that petitioner Bautista is the lawful incumbent of the office of Chairman of the Commission on Human Rights by virtue of her appointment, as such, by the President on 17 December 1988, and her acceptance thereof, is not to say that she cannot be removed from office before the expiration of her seven (7) year term. She certainly can be removed but her removal must be for cause and with her right to due process properly safeguarded. In the case of NASECO vs. NLRC, this Court held that before a rank-and-file employee of the NASECO, a government-owned corporation, could be dismissed, she was entitled to a hearing and due process. How much more, in the case of the Chairman of a constitutionally mandated INDEPENDENT OFFICE, like the Commission on Human Rights.

If there are charges against Bautista for misfeasance or malfeasance in office, charges may be filed against her with the Ombudsman. If he finds a prima facie case against her, the corresponding information or informations can be filed with the Sandiganbayan which may in turn order her suspension from office while the case or cases against her are pending before said court. This is due process in action. This is the way of a government of laws and not of men.

X x x.




Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4572

Trending Articles